Bodybuilding Forum - DiscussBodybuilding.com
 
Register Calendar My Profile Login Logout My Forums About Us
Advanced Search

who is better??????

 
Users viewing this topic: none
Logged in as: Guest
  PrintPrintable Version
Reply All Forums >> [Specifically For You] >> Teenage Bodybuilding >> who is better?????? Page: [1]
[Poll]

who is better??????


Arnold Schwarzenegger
  47% (8)
Lou Ferrigno
  17% (3)
Shawn Ray
  0% (0)
Darian Yates
  0% (0)
Jay Cutler
  11% (2)
Lee Haney
  0% (0)
Ronnie Coleman
  17% (3)
Franco Columbo
  5% (1)
Mike Katz
  0% (0)
Frank Zane
  0% (0)


Total Votes : 17


(last vote on : 12/12/2005 5:27:28 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
who is better?????? - 10/27/2005 10:25:36 PM   
Hulk


Posts: 140
Joined: 10/26/2005
From: US/Tennessee
Status: offline
 Which body builder in ur opinion was a better one not just who won more competetions but who was better!!!!

_____________________________

"Having No Way As The Way, Having No Limitation As Your Limitation"

-Bruce Lee

I Buy All My Supplements from http://www.supplements101.com/?Click=20528 Check It Out
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 1
DiscussBodybuilding.com recommends buying your bodybuilding supplements from Supplements101.com
RE: who is better?????? - 10/29/2005 4:23:25 PM   
S13D

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 6/23/2005
Status: offline
Ronnie Coleman

Dont compare Arnold to the Olympics winners now.
They are bigger then Arnold and they are better.
Arnold, i remember correctly Arnold in his prime was 22in arms, Ronnie right now is 24-25in, his chest and everything is bigger then Arnold
the back plays a huge part in today bodybuilding because all of them have big biceps, chest, etc.
Arnold back cant compare to many of them now

(in reply to Hulk)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 2
RE: who is better?????? - 10/29/2005 7:12:02 PM   
Hulk


Posts: 140
Joined: 10/26/2005
From: US/Tennessee
Status: offline
yea but big doesnt mean everything. When there judging a body building competetion they look to make sure all ur muscles are even with each other make sure none r over worked then the others. And if u have that then ur realli the best bodybuilder. So i think those guys can all be put in the same category.

_____________________________

"Having No Way As The Way, Having No Limitation As Your Limitation"

-Bruce Lee

I Buy All My Supplements from http://www.supplements101.com/?Click=20528 Check It Out

(in reply to S13D)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 3
RE: who is better?????? - 10/29/2005 7:13:12 PM   
Hulk


Posts: 140
Joined: 10/26/2005
From: US/Tennessee
Status: offline
o yea and arnolds arms at prime were bigger then that also.

(in reply to Hulk)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 4
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 8:10:41 AM   
S13D

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 6/23/2005
Status: offline
At his bodybuilding peak his chest was 57", waist 34", biceps 22", thighs 28½", calves 20", and his competition weight was 235 lbs (260 lbs off-season).

height = 6' 2" (1.88 m)
and for his height and only weighting 235lbs in his prime that would not even get him in Olympia

Ronnie Coleman
Height = 5' 11''
Weight : (Contest) 255lbs, (Off season) 300lbs
biceps: 24"
chest: 60"
 
You supposed to look real good for your height, and if a 5' 11" man weights more and more muscular than a 6'2" man
Tell me how that 6'2" man can win.
"Yeah big doesnt mean anything" Tell that to the Olympia bodybuilders now, all of them are defines and everything, most of them look perfect on stage.





(in reply to Hulk)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 5
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 9:34:35 AM   
Hulk


Posts: 140
Joined: 10/26/2005
From: US/Tennessee
Status: offline
 I know alot of bodybuilders. And all of them have told me yea big is something but they would give that up for all there muscles to be even with each other and they would like to have bulk but more defined in that.

_____________________________

"Having No Way As The Way, Having No Limitation As Your Limitation"

-Bruce Lee

I Buy All My Supplements from http://www.supplements101.com/?Click=20528 Check It Out

(in reply to S13D)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 6
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 4:10:27 PM   
S13D

 

Posts: 14
Joined: 6/23/2005
Status: offline
Right now Jay Cutler and most of the Olympias are even
They are world class after all
Size makes a difference too but bodybuilding is more of toning and definition
Bodybuilding = looks
The thing i dont get is how Arnold Schwarzenegger in the running with the bodybuilders now
they are as define as him back then and all the muscle wise they look better too.

(in reply to Hulk)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 7
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 4:36:11 PM   
Hulk


Posts: 140
Joined: 10/26/2005
From: US/Tennessee
Status: offline
i added him cuz everyone likes him

_____________________________

"Having No Way As The Way, Having No Limitation As Your Limitation"

-Bruce Lee

I Buy All My Supplements from http://www.supplements101.com/?Click=20528 Check It Out

(in reply to S13D)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 8
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 5:14:23 PM   
The Sheep Man


Posts: 1274
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
I like arnolds look more than modern globs of muscle

(in reply to Hulk)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 9
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 6:44:41 PM   
Hulk


Posts: 140
Joined: 10/26/2005
From: US/Tennessee
Status: offline
i agree with u sheep man he looks awesome.

(in reply to The Sheep Man)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 10
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 8:42:16 PM   
phersan


Posts: 713
Joined: 4/24/2005
From: PA
Status: offline
I think the olympia bodybuilders nowaday are too big. It's almost unbelieveable to see a human that big and so defined... I think it's much more pleasing to look at something like arnold's size, although I still think he could use bigger quads.. he's got a big upper body and needs bigger legs.

_____________________________

Official Sand Bagger of the Emancipation Detoxification. Protecting n00bs from floods since 2/12/08.

Age: 20
Height: 6'1"
Weight: 170 [5/20/08]

Starting an Optimum Anabolics workout regimen, check out my log: phersan's Optimum Anabolics Log
(10 weeks remaining)


Goals after program:
Weight: 190
Look: Sexy

I plan on tweaking the OA program a bit and starting my own version of it after I've completed an 18-week cycle.

(in reply to Hulk)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 11
RE: who is better?????? - 10/30/2005 8:51:26 PM   
The Sheep Man


Posts: 1274
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
i think his legs suit him

(in reply to phersan)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 12
RE: who is better?????? - 11/2/2005 4:03:36 PM   
shaknasty

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 11/2/2005
Status: offline
size isnt everything at the olympia. if u remember frank zane smoked arnold back in the day.zanes the best.he was by far the most sculted and symmetric bodybuilder there ever was.

(in reply to The Sheep Man)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 13
RE: who is better?????? - 11/3/2005 7:33:37 PM   
Hulk


Posts: 140
Joined: 10/26/2005
From: US/Tennessee
Status: offline
 Y didnt u vote for frank zane then i have him on the poll. Since i think he was a very good bodybuilder also.

_____________________________

"Having No Way As The Way, Having No Limitation As Your Limitation"

-Bruce Lee

I Buy All My Supplements from http://www.supplements101.com/?Click=20528 Check It Out

(in reply to shaknasty)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 14
RE: who is better?????? - 11/3/2005 7:54:44 PM   
BouSa_ToWn


Posts: 191
Joined: 7/21/2005
From: ONTARIO,CA
Status: offline
ARNOLD IS OSOM.

ronnie coleman is to big, he looks gross, just cause hes like pure muscle, which is pretty sick, and i think hes on steroids lol.

< Message edited by BouSa_ToWn -- 11/3/2005 7:55:55 PM >

(in reply to Hulk)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 15
RE: who is better?????? - 11/7/2005 12:25:19 PM   
DaddyDanDan


Posts: 255
Joined: 1/17/2005
Status: offline
you know i think that everyone needs to realize that the whole deal is that todays technology is better
so put ronnie on the same program arnold was on and see what happens
also arnold did all of this before he was 30
ronnie may have one more win but he is 40+
muscle maturity is also a major player
arnold retired very early
earlier than most of todays bbs turn pro
the avg age is probably around 30 something

with that being said i voted for franco

haha

_____________________________

If weightlifting was easy, everyone would do it

You gotta lift BIG, to get BIG

Doesn't matter how much you lift but how you lift it

(in reply to BouSa_ToWn)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 16
RE: who is better?????? - 11/7/2005 12:43:16 PM   
twistedlink


Posts: 3130
Joined: 5/31/2005
Status: offline
Unless 235lbs arnold was 5'10"

Sociologist Ralph Keyes has shown that men often claim to be taller than they are. That goes double for celebrities. Men's Health magazine compared claimed heights to actual heights and discovered that Arnold Schwarzenegger was 5-10, not 6-2, that Charles Bronson was 5-7, not 5-11, and Burt Reynolds 5-8, not 5-11.
 
I posted this in another forum im on and cant find the link-i shall try, but cant promise anything
 
here is more on the debate though
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arnold_Schwarzenegger#Height


http://home.arcor.de/stuffpage/reviews/schwarzenegger/asss.jpg

the sly stallone is apparently 5'10 and heres arnold same height as stallone

then again stallone also fakes his height and is apparently 5'7 and wears special shoes, itd explain why he looks DAMN ****ing ripped to hell at 155lbs wasnt it?

sorry but im over 155lbs now and only 1 inch taller(sometimes 2 if i sleep on my back all night) han stallones apparent height and am nowhere near his size so he must be 5'7 or something like that.

given he's wearing shoes and given he is 5'10 in them and given arnold is exactly his height practically-its believable arny was 5'10

User Posted Image

you think thats 235lbs at 6'2"?

No way, he's either shorter-or heavier than 235lbs, and lying about height is easier than weight

_____________________________

http://dbboutofbounds.proboards105.com/index.cgi

The hopefully only temporary OOB, dont worry i dont bite lol.

User Posted Image

(in reply to DaddyDanDan)
Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 17
RE: who is better?????? - 11/7/2005 9:58:08 PM   
phersan


Posts: 713
Joined: 4/24/2005
From: PA
Status: offline
^that chest is unreal.. it's like two big balloons... ridiculous.

_____________________________

Official Sand Bagger of the Emancipation Detoxification. Protecting n00bs from floods since 2/12/08.

Age: 20
Height: 6'1"
Weight: 170 [5/20/08]

Starting an Optimum Anabolics workout regimen, check out my log: phersan's Optimum Anabolics Log
(10 weeks remaining)


Goals after program:
Weight: 190
Look: Sexy

I plan on tweaking the OA program a bit and starting my own version of it after I've completed an 18-week cycle.

(in reply to twistedlink)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 18
RE: who is better?????? - 11/24/2005 8:08:22 PM   
bodybuilding is life


Posts: 459
Joined: 11/18/2005
Status: offline
dang. how long of serious working out would it take to look like that? did arnold ever take any supps?

(in reply to phersan)
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member Post #: 19
   
Advertisement
Email Author Private Message Add Member To Cotnact List Block Member
Page:   [1]
Reply All Forums >> [Specifically For You] >> Teenage Bodybuilding >> who is better?????? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
No Post New Thread
No Reply to Message
No Post New Poll
No Submit Vote
No Delete My Own Post
No Delete My Own Thread
No Rate Posts




DB Wearables | Bookmark Us | XML Feed

Recommended Sites:

Supplements 101 | Beginning-Bodybuilding | JustAskMarc | FreedomFly.net

Copyright © 2003-2008 DiscussBodybuilding.com. All rights reserved.
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5.5 Unicode