﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>136 Supplements Reviewed!!!...Well Not really</title><link>http://www.discussbodybuilding.com/</link><description /><copyright>(c) DiscussBodybuilding.com</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title> RE: 136 Supplements Reviewed!!!...Well Not really (jenng)</title><description>  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah... it's sad that there's no decent fitness magazines out there.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Sounds like a project for someone here.  Marc? Are you ready to branch out? </description><link>http://www.discussbodybuilding.com/fb.ashx?m=22512</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:46:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: 136 Supplements Reviewed!!!...Well Not really (WDNinABQ)</title><description>  Yeah... it's sad that there's no decent fitness magazines out there.  Something I can kill some time with on a plane or whatever.  Muscle Media was probably the best (I really don't care for the Flex style mags), but they stopped production a few months back. &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Thank god for DB then, eh? </description><link>http://www.discussbodybuilding.com/fb.ashx?m=22507</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 20:20:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> RE: 136 Supplements Reviewed!!!...Well Not really (mhartman)</title><description>  I'm almost ashamed to admit that I have a subscription to M&amp;F. For Valentine's Day I asked my wife for a training mag subscription. I looked through 3 or 4 (Flex, M&amp;F, some others that were equally full of BS) and picked M&amp;F. It's not a terrible scan but it really does pertain to the extreme end of the spectrum. &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Here's the REALLY funny part. I moved a month or so after my first magazine showed up. I contacted M&amp;F to have my address changed. Their response: "We pre-print the shipping labels so it may take up to 3 months for the change to take effect. We recommend you have your local post office forward your old mail to your new address". Bull****! My post office wants $30 for that service, it'd be cheaper to just buy more magazines! So the people in my old place get to enjoy 3 months of my subscription. </description><link>http://www.discussbodybuilding.com/fb.ashx?m=22500</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 18:36:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title> 136 Supplements Reviewed!!!...Well Not really (Pappy)</title><description>  So I'm at my local Vons...doing some shopping and while waiting for my girlfriend to pick out some canned food, I noticed the latest issue of Muscle and Fitness? (I think that's the name).  On they'er cover, they have this huge font saying: &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  "136 SUPPLEMENTS REVIEWED!" &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  With a subtitle statying something to the effect of "we reviewed and tested which supplements work and which ones don't. &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Anyways, I was highly interested in this as I was wondering how they'd tip-toe around the hoard of ads that consume they're magazine (Let's see 80% ads, 20% content).  Anyways, as I'm getting to the editorial, I see that they reviewed supplements alright...but it's crap like vitamin E, and a bunch of vitamins (IMO).  Anyways, I just laughed at myself, silly of me to think a MAGAZINE would give you the truth on any actual supplemtns.  I know vitamins are supplements too...but you all know exactly what I'm referring to.  I was thinking of seeing reviews of EAS's, Twinlab's creatines, proteins, and whatnot... &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  It's funny because I would imagine that ANYONE who's a regular reader of M&amp;F would have already done research or whatever on almost everything they listed, and would have found that article utterly useless....save for headline value... </description><link>http://www.discussbodybuilding.com/fb.ashx?m=22485</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:14:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>