OK... I somewhat agree with that but lets look at the other side of the coin... Who would these people be that are hitting their muscles with so much intensity that they might need a full week to recover. As we all know, for both strength and hypertrophy, the muscle only needs micro-damage in order for strength and growth to take place..
Micro: very small, tiny,..etc.....
So other than someone such as an
anabolic steroid injecting pro, who are these people that are at a level where they would
need to do 20 plus sets of intense work on a muscle to achieve micro-damage???.. so again..
I ask, even if the muscles hasn't fully recovered after 72 hours.. what is the benefit of allowing it another 96 hours to do so.. Studies have shown that a muscle doesn't need to fully recover before it can be stimulated again... Please, anyone who cares to jump in and, I'll repeat.. EXPLAIN IN DETAIL THE BENEFITS OF THIS...
Thanks for your reply David, I'm farily confident you and I are on the same page with this.. but I'm looking for a little more in depth answer...
FYI, I've done some fairly gruesome workouts and can't ever recall needing longer than 2-3 days to fully recover, or at least recover enough to hit the muscle again within a few days...
ORIGINAL: David1991
2 things..
1. i dont think most people should only train the muscle once a week
unless...
2. they are doing very high volume and/or high intensity workouts where they will need more than 72 hours to recover.
if someone is doing 6 sets for chest i think they can definitely hit it again in 3-4 days. if they're doing 9+ sets using intensive methods they will need longer. basically frequency will be related to intensity and volume
<message edited by smoundzou on Saturday, July 12, 2008 7:11 AM>