Week 1 Summary: Start of Week Stats (Saturday, 2007-01-06): 5'11", 185.4 lbs (body fat unknown, no available measurements). Saturday, 2007-01-06: Weight: 185.4 lbs.
Had first workout in evening, triceps, chest and abs. Don't know the excercises, so it took over an hour, which is obviously not ideal. Once I get the hang of it, I think it'll be more like 45 minutes.
Was able to use a bit heavier weights than I expected. Not
heavy by any means, but certainly heavier than my apparently low expectations.
Food: Didn't keep track yet, but I probably ate pizza all day.
Sunday, 2007-01-07: Weight: 184.8 lbs
Feel whooped this morning, but not much pain. Triceps still feel pumped, espescially left. I can actually flex it and see it do stuff! Started diet today - light bike ride to the store and back to pick up some healthy junk. Had a more vigorous bike ride in the evening for cardio (37 minutes).
Discovered nuts and peanut butter have even more fat than I originally imagined. Unable to eat enough of this rabbit food to get in enough calories. Need more meat and heavy-duty carbs.
Left triceps seemed to get a pump for no reason around bedtime.
Food: 2295 calories, 153g protein. 35% of calories from fat. :-(
Monday, 2007-01-08: Weight: 184.6 lbs
Slept very well. More sore than yesterday, but not bad. Left arm sorta seems bigger, but that just be my overactive imagination going. Got some protein powder stuff from store for post-workout shake.
Workout at 6:10 pm, abs, back, bisceps, forearms. The pump on my right arm pulled my skin tighter, and I could kinda see the shape of my triceps. Looks cool!
Was craving and eating beef jerky all day. Felt like diet went better overall...
Food: 3062 calories, 230 g protein, only 15% fat (too low!)
Tuesday, 2007-01-09: Weight: 184.6 lbs
Slept not quite as well. Forgot mid-morning meal. Discovered that caesar salad is a waste of stomach space and has more fat than you'd think. Had a grilled cheese along with it for lunch, and that actually fit my diet better.
Had a couple slices of pizza and a beer, but they were OK because I had planned for them. :-)
Biked in evening.
Food: 2939 calories, 175 g protein, 30% of calories from fat
Wednesday, 2007-01-10: Weight: 183.8 lbs (retaining water? calories too low?)
Workout at 6:22 pm, shoulders and legs. My hamstrings are disturbingly inflexible. I can't even come close to reaching the floor without bending my knees. I'll have to work extra hard on stretching them. I demanded more of my legs today than I have of my upper body because they're in much better shape than the rest of me. Plus big muscles = big workout! Go quads go! Got it in under an hour, but was COMPLETELY spent. Legs were like wet noodles.
Really hungry all day. Miscalculated somewhere and probably ate too much.
Food: 3324 calories, 212 g protein, 22% of calories from fat
Thursday, 2007-01-11: Weight: 184.6 lbs
Big muscle = big pain! Not that bad really. I might be walking a little funny... Could proably have broken in more gently. Felt like I helped somebody move yesterday. Somebody who owns lots of pool tables.
Kept cardio very light with legs like this.
Food: 2975 calories, 163 g protein, 27% of calories from fat
Friday, 2007-01-12: Weight: 185 lbs
Off day, and it's a good thing. Quads still feel really worn out and sore, but I can see some new shape in my calves. They started out in pretty decent shape to begin with, so I'm surprised. Is a visible improvement really possible with one workout?
Food: 3066 calories, 176 g protein, 25% of calories from fat
End of Week Stats (Saturday, 2007-01-13): 5'11", 185.2 lbs, ~22% body fat. To get body fat, I tried both measurements with a Myotape measure and a fat caliper. I couldn't get consitent results with the caliper, so I'm not confident I'm going to be able to track that well with that, but both methods were pretty close to in the end. I am confident that I'll be able to get very accurate and consistent measurements with the tape, even though the fat estimates for that might not be as good generally.
Skin folds: It was easy to get consistent results with bisceps, so I took that even though it's not used in the 3 site formula. Chest was also pretty easy to get to be consistent. It was very hard to get a consistent result with the abdomen measurement. Slightly different placement of the caliper gave me results that were up to 10 or more mm different. I took lots of measurements, then took an average of where the largest group of them seemed to be clustered. Thigh was hard because my skin is extremely tight there. I managed to give myself a nice bruise in the end, but I think the measurement is not too inaccurate.
Biscep: 9mm
Chest: 20mm
Abdomen: ~34mm
Thigh: 20mm
Body fat: 21.9% (3 site formula)
Measurements: I feel that I am able to get very consistent measurements here.
L calf: 14"
R calf: 14 3/8"
L thigh: 23 1/4"
R thigh: 23 1/8"
waist: 38"
chest: 38 3/4"
neck: 15 7/8"
L forearm: 10 5/8"
R forearm: 10 3/4"
L biscep: 11 1/2"
R biscep: 12 1/4"
Body fat: 22.76% (http://www.dietandfitnesstoday.com/bodyfat.php)
<message edited by jheft on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 6:53 PM>