Change Page:
123 > | Showing page 1 of 3, messages 1 to 15 of 34
Jayman30187
-
Total Posts
:
1064
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 10/9/2005
- Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
-
Status: offline
|
Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:33 AM
Pics don't work for some reason
<message edited by Jayman30187 on Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:35 AM>
|
|
DanR
-
Total Posts
:
80
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 4/15/2006
- Location: Hell
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:40 AM
Not sure why you would put a thread titled Ronnei vs Arnold in the Supplements forum. Unless it has something to do with the supps they take? Fill us in a little, Jayman30187.
|
|
Jayman30187
-
Total Posts
:
1064
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 10/9/2005
- Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:54 AM
The pics didn't work of the two. I was just going to say everybody makes a big deal about Ronnie and I think Arnold is the true king, due to how there diets are probably a little different and Ronnie has the advantage today with Creatines, NOS, better protein powders and stuff like that. They both use and used roids that is for sure. I think Ronnie has the advantage with todays supplements and training, but Arnolds Biceps are more impressive, Arnolds waist isn't bloated looking and much thinner and he has overall better symmetry
|
|
GyM RaT
-
Total Posts
:
554
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 1/30/2006
- Location: The Bay Area *408*
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 12:32 PM
true....no big belly. but arnolds biceps also stuck out past his shoulders, LOL
Age: 17, 5'11", 213 Squat: 315 Dead: 305 Bench: 305 STACK: Leukic, ON 100% Whey, Activite
|
|
EB208
-
Total Posts
:
196
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 2/6/2006
- Location: Idaho
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:44 PM
In my opinion, Arnold is the true king of bodybuilding. Ronnie is way over rated and doenst need 8 Mr. Olympia titles.
|
|
PimpWivGunZ
-
Total Posts
:
1032
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 11/10/2005
- Location: My mum
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:53 PM
what kinda workouts do you think them 2 do to get so huge? like, body parts twice a week, 5x5 10x3...?
|
|
Blackwmw
-
Total Posts
:
459
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 5/30/2006
- Location: Newport News, VA
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:55 PM
Ronnie earned the titles that he has. He is very deserving of them. There isn't another man alive who has the same muscle mass, proportion, symetry, etc. The sport is looking for the mass monsters right now and that's what Ronnie brings to the table. I personally think that Dexter Jackson has a more aestetically pleasing physique, but Ronnie has earned the titles that he holds. I agree though that Arnold is the king of bodybuilding. There has not been anybody do for this sport what Arnold has. He made this sport what it is today. Had they been on stage together, it would depend on the judges who won. Some would say Ronnie, some would say Arnold (depending on what was important to them). Had Arnold had the advantage of todays technology, nutrition, supplements, and knowledge, I think that he would have beat Ronnie hands down.
|
|
DrZman
-
Total Posts
:
104
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 3/21/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 6:47 PM
bodybuilding to the point of being the cover boy of mens health, and maximum fitness, or fitness rx, etc is ok by all means. when ur massive like ronnie or most of the bodybuilders, its pure disgusting. not visually appealing at all and u wont find a pretty lady cuz uknow, most dont like guys like that. ud prolly end up with a chick with 16" biceps and pecs. bottom line: they are both too big and god thats ugly  ...well arnold is borderline...ronnie, dont get me started on him
Currently Using: Centrum Performance Now Sports Adam Superior Men Zma Tribulus Nitrix Cellmass No-Xplode Syntha-6 Methyl Ripped
|
|
GyM RaT
-
Total Posts
:
554
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 1/30/2006
- Location: The Bay Area *408*
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:20 PM
hands down is the best for what hes known for = PURE MASS
Age: 17, 5'11", 213 Squat: 315 Dead: 305 Bench: 305 STACK: Leukic, ON 100% Whey, Activite
|
|
No Quarter
-
Total Posts
:
1854
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 4/18/2005
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:27 PM
As a bodybuilder Ronnie has done better simply because of his sheer size. Anyone saying that Arnold could take him are being persuaded by their personal affection for the guy. On the stage, Ronnie would win simply because Arnold wouldn't make it far enough on today's stages to be compared side by side with Ronnie.
|
|
Avaric3
-
Total Posts
:
1774
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 5/26/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:02 PM
if arnold had the same protein and creatine and other supps as ronnie did today i think arnold could compete with him
IM BACK AND BETTER THAN EVER!!!!!
|
|
Coulaid
-
Total Posts
:
1069
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 5/21/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:18 PM
ORIGINAL: Blackwmw Ronnie earned the titles that he has. He is very deserving of them. There isn't another man alive who has the same muscle mass, proportion, symetry, etc. The sport is looking for the mass monsters right now and that's what Ronnie brings to the table. I personally think that Dexter Jackson has a more aestetically pleasing physique, but Ronnie has earned the titles that he holds. I agree though that Arnold is the king of bodybuilding. There has not been anybody do for this sport what Arnold has. He made this sport what it is today. Had they been on stage together, it would depend on the judges who won. Some would say Ronnie, some would say Arnold (depending on what was important to them). Had Arnold had the advantage of todays technology, nutrition, supplements, and knowledge, I think that he would have beat Ronnie hands down. Well Said! I find Melvin Anthony's + Dexters phsique very apppealing. But Ronnie is simply amazing. He does deserve all of the wins IMHO.
|
|
Coulaid
-
Total Posts
:
1069
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 5/21/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:21 PM
There's a lot more to Ronnies arsenal then the BSN Mass Stack ;) About the protein from what I've seen w\ pro's most of their protein comes from whole foods chicken, eggs, turkey etc. ORIGINAL: Avaric3 if arnold had the same protein and creatine and other supps as ronnie did today i think arnold could compete with him
|
|
Avaric3
-
Total Posts
:
1774
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 5/26/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:24 PM
ORIGINAL: Coulaid There's a lot more to Ronnies arsenal then the BSN Mass Stack ;) lol, i catch your drift. arnold used roids too though
IM BACK AND BETTER THAN EVER!!!!!
|
|
raiderlax43
-
Total Posts
:
456
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 4/25/2006
-
Status: offline
|
RE: Ronnie vs Arnold
-
Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:51 PM
arnie didnt eat the same way as bodybuilders today. he didnt have much besides protein and roids..i mean there was a few things but no creatine, no n02, and arnold certainly didnt take GH,HGC,HGH, or any kind of growth hormone like ronnie did. arnold didnt have fancy cutting supps. either, he had no XPEL or watershed to take ten days before the olympia. in todays modern world...arnie would be up there with ronnie, but we would never know what arnold could truly amount to with modern technology. as for ronnie winning the olympias...he deserves it.
you only look as good as you feel
|
|