|
DiscussBodybuilding.com
Master Lifter
- Total Posts : 5274
- Reward points : 10
- Joined: 6/20/2003
- Status: online
|
|
| |
thebirdman
-
Total Posts
:
6
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 12/22/2008
-
Status: offline
|
OVT or GVT?
-
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:03 PM
( #1 )
for people that know what that title means, do you think GVT or OVT is better and why? Thanks
|
|
Nm0ney34
-
Total Posts
:
2617
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 11/19/2006
- Location: Ohio
-
Status: offline
|
Re:OVT or GVT?
-
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:10 PM
( #2 )
For those who are wondering. OVT is Optimized volume training GVT is German volume training anyway I would probably go with OVT but they are both essentially the same thing accept. ovt has supersets. 2 for each body part so 50 reps per super set, 100 total. ovt adjusts weight between sets if necessary. ovt rest between super sets is longer that being said I have never tried either. But if I had to or if I were to recommend these to anyone, it would be to someone who is already at or close to that elite level of bodybuilding. Not for anyone who is novice-intermediate. just my 2cents.
<message edited by Nm0ney34 on Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:11 PM>
6'3" @213 Squat 1x20x275 press:200, Deadlift:475, Bench:300, P.clean:235, Squat:385 "The only failure that is final is to stop trying to improve"
|
|
MVP
-
Total Posts
:
2387
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 1/5/2009
- Location: Virginia
-
Status: offline
|
Re:OVT or GVT?
-
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:22 PM
( #3 )
GVT OVT I did a bit of reading on them a while back, I'd just keep things simple but I really wouldn't do either personally. GVT almost seems like an antagonistic style training (which is my preference).
ACE-CPT, NASM-CPT, AFPA-Nutrition Consultant
|
|