Lockedcellmass vs. celltech

Author
eric12345678
Just Starting Out
  • Total Posts : 6
  • Reward points : 10
  • Joined: 2006/01/31 17:46:01
  • Status: offline
2007/07/31 15:33:41 (permalink)
0

cellmass vs. celltech

So I have prefected my diet, sleeping well, got back into working out for the past 2 months and now im looking to add creatine.  I have been looking around and I now need some help.  I am stuck trying to pick between MuscleTech Cell-Tech and BSN CellMass.  I am 150, 5'-8" last time I checked around 11% body fat.  I take a daily multivitamin and whey after I work out.
#1

11 Replies Related Threads

    tackledog
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 49
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/06/10 08:26:10
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/07/31 15:36:14 (permalink)
    0
    I used to use Cell-Tech and it works but there are side effects. There is like 75 gams of sugar per serving so it raised myblood pressure and I had to get off of it. It is like sugar plus a little creatine.
    It tastes great like gatorade but you sould go with cellmass over cell-tech.
    #2
    Jayman666
    Trainee
    • Total Posts : 135
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/05/27 15:46:45
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/07/31 18:17:44 (permalink)
    0
    Sign up for Supplmentpolice.com and read the Felonies... They tested Cellmass and it was said to  have 1.5 monohydrate creatine in it.. It's suppose to be 3 grams CEE (Creatine Ethyl Ester) So yeah Cellmass Sucks
    #3
    USMC8080
    New Member
    • Total Posts : 94
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/07/15 20:33:23
    • Location: Nj
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/07/31 18:34:18 (permalink)
    0
    idk i personally like cellmass, its been working good for me
    #4
    ranger20
    Master Lifter
    • Total Posts : 1136
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/02/27 17:35:22
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/07/31 22:06:42 (permalink)
    0
    never tried cell mass.  celltech hc is great IMO.  the sugar that is in it is dextrose(not the same thing as regular sugar), it helps the creatine get into your system quicker. only problem i see with celltech is the price.  way overpriced, like most of muscletech'stuff
    #5
    Trueplaya6984
    Trainee
    • Total Posts : 219
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/01/30 13:03:11
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/08/02 16:41:56 (permalink)
    0

    ORIGINAL: Jayman666

    Sign up for Supplmentpolice.com and read the Felonies... They tested Cellmass and it was said to  have 1.5 monohydrate creatine in it.. It's suppose to be 3 grams CEE (Creatine Ethyl Ester) So yeah Cellmass Sucks


    Your info must be wrong or the site is stupid. First off Cellmass IS NOT CEE it is CEM. Two different things. Also I seriously doubt its 1.5 grams of Mono in it. Thats not enough to do anything. I took the Cellmass and liked it very much it works great and is better than Celltech (which I have also tried). So since Celltech has 10g of Mono and your saying that there is 1.5 mono in cellmass I wouldn't have gotten better gains out of cellmass. Also with mono you have to cycle and with Cellmass you don't need a cycle.

    So my vote is go with Cellmass
    #6
    Jayman666
    Trainee
    • Total Posts : 135
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/05/27 15:46:45
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/08/02 17:11:10 (permalink)
    0
    ORIGINAL: Trueplaya6984

    ORIGINAL: Jayman666

    Sign up for Supplmentpolice.com and read the Felonies... They tested Cellmass and it was said to  have 1.5 monohydrate creatine in it.. It's suppose to be 3 grams CEE (Creatine Ethyl Ester) So yeah Cellmass Sucks


    Your info must be wrong or the site is stupid. First off Cellmass IS NOT CEE it is CEM. Two different things. Also I seriously doubt its 1.5 grams of Mono in it. Thats not enough to do anything. I took the Cellmass and liked it very much it works great and is better than Celltech (which I have also tried). So since Celltech has 10g of Mono and your saying that there is 1.5 mono in cellmass I wouldn't have gotten better gains out of cellmass. Also with mono you have to cycle and with Cellmass you don't need a cycle.

    So my vote is go with Cellmass
     
     
     
     
     
    Check this link http://supplementpol.proboards59.com/index.cgi?board=feloneous&action=display&thread=1168981452 
     
    You may need to sign up for an account to view it. I don't know.
     
     
    Cellmass does to have Creatine Ethyl Ester in it...
     




    CEM3™(Creatine Ethyl Ester Malate)Patent Pending
    3000mg
     
     
    Anyway doesn't matter because in study they only found 1.5 grams creatine mono in it...
    #7
    RHJ1691
    Trainee
    • Total Posts : 107
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/03/23 18:15:01
    • Location: Texas
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/08/02 19:54:26 (permalink)
    0
    i took cell tech hc it didnt do nothing for me but it worked for my brother  so i think it depends on every person cellmass imo sounds pretty good i am also of thinking of trying it but if cell tech didnt work would cellmass since there both creatine?

    16 yrs.old
    5'9
    #8
    TheRunningback20
    Just Starting Out
    • Total Posts : 8
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/06/27 08:56:53
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/08/03 05:43:21 (permalink)
    0
    I've been taking Cellmass for about the past year and a half along with NO-xplode.  I've had gains like none other and the Cellmass really seems like it helps with muscle recovery.
     
    I've never taken Celltech, but from personal experience I've never had to becuase Cellmass has been so good to me!

    Age:20
    Height: 5'7"
    Weight: 175

    Maxes (as of beginning of May 2007)
    Bench: 365
    Squat: 465
    Clean: 260
    #9
    chudat
    Just Starting Out
    • Total Posts : 3
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/08/04 08:54:40
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/08/04 09:02:16 (permalink)
    0
        I've been taking cellmass over three weeks now and i didn't see any major difference in my size or strength. Maybe I'm taking cellmass the wrong way. Because of school, i work out late around 8:30 at night and i finish around 10pm. Then i drink a serving of cell mass. two hours later, I eat my 6th meal along with multivitamin. Go to sleep, wakes up around 8:30 and have my second serving of cell mass. Is that the correct way to take cell mass?

    Somebody please help!!!!!
    #10
    Jayman666
    Trainee
    • Total Posts : 135
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/05/27 15:46:45
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/08/04 18:25:29 (permalink)
    0
    If you guys wanna blow that much on 1.5 grams mono and a little glutamine, just buy mono creatine in bulk and some glutamine get way more servings.
    #11
    Trueplaya6984
    Trainee
    • Total Posts : 219
    • Reward points : 10
    • Joined: 2007/01/30 13:03:11
    • Status: offline
    RE: cellmass vs. celltech 2007/08/04 19:19:53 (permalink)
    0
    Nope its a Malate which is different from CEE. Trust me they are different in how they go to your muscles. Its CEM not CEE. If it was CEE it would say CEE not CEM. Just because it has Creatine Ethyl Ester in the description doesn't mean thats what it is. It's a different form.
    #12
    Jump to: