One question that I have about this, is that is the additional caloretic deficit from the training the reason for the cell shrinkage?
Referring to:
Diet only did not change subcutaneous abdominal adipocyte size, whereas both diet plus exercise groups significantly reduced abdominal adipocyte size. Remember that these are all obese people.
In obese people, fat behaves differently than in someone with a moderate or low bodyfat, so that is a factor.
Naturally we would expect to see a larger loss of fat mass with the exercising group
and, if they used resistance training, an increase of lean mass, which could result in a lower overall loss of weight but a greater loss of fat mass.
Now with the exercising group vs the non exercising group:
In previous studies we have seen that usning
only a hypocaloric diet (calorie defiecient) leads to a loss of total weight from
fat and lean mass. Addition of aerobic exercise only to the hypocaloric diet led to a slightly higher overall weight loss, again from
fat and lean mass. Addition of resistance training led to a sparing and even increase of lean mass while increasing the amount of total fat mass lost.
Adding exercise could also deminish overall stress and cortisol, which could lesson the amount of stress related fat storage which deposited in the abdominal region.
There are additional hormone and neurotransmitter actions which might contribute to the overall effect of minimizing deposition of fat in the abdominal area.