CFM vs Hydrolyzed Whey
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
Login  | |
|
CFM vs Hydrolyzed Whey - 5/29/2003 2:34:20 PM
|
|
|
IPL
Posts: 19
Joined: 4/29/2003
Status: offline
|
What would be better for post workout, Cross Flow Microfiltered or Standard Grade Hydrolyzed Whey, and is either a bad choice? I usually drink about 45g post workout.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CFM vs Hydrolyzed Whey - 5/29/2003 4:15:41 PM
|
|
|
Twin Peak
Posts: 1489
Joined: 5/9/2003
Status: offline
|
Both are fine, one is *theroretically better* than the other.
See www.proteincustomizer.com for good descriptions of the two, and quality yet cheap customized formulations.
_____________________________
http://www.designersupps.com
Email: steve @ designersupps.com
Peak Physiques™
INTELLIGENT DESIGN IS COMING, register now at
http://www.intelligentdesignmag.com
(in reply to IPL)
|
|
|
|
RE: CFM vs Hydrolyzed Whey - 5/29/2003 9:34:26 PM
|
|
|
IPL
Posts: 19
Joined: 4/29/2003
Status: offline
|
 Now that is one sweet site..
How come I didn' t see this before? Hot damn!
(in reply to IPL)
|
|
|
|
|
RE: CFM vs Hydrolyzed Whey - 6/3/2003 7:21:24 PM
|
|
|
Marc David
Posts: 6742
Joined: 4/6/2003
From: Bay Area -CA
Status: offline
|
quote:
In terms of protein synthesis rate, the hydrolized would produce a greater degree of synthesis at a faster rate. There isn' t much difference between the two. The higher quality brands put their protein through the Cross Flow flitration before they hydrolize it anyway.
The flitration process (ie cross flow) has little bearing on the integrity of the protein, it is just a way to clean it up in a sense.
-Found this on About.com
_____________________________
(in reply to IPL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Printable Version
