|
DiscussBodybuilding.com
Master Lifter
- Total Posts : 5274
- Reward points : 10
- Joined: 6/20/2003
- Status: online
|
|
| |
SigAlphAdam
-
Total Posts
:
15
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 9/3/2003
-
Status: offline
|
BPX?
-
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:22 PM
( #1 )
What's up with BPX? I've heard its supposed to be much better than 1AD. Are there any side effects (other than the usual PH effects?) How are the results?
|
|
Twin Peak
-
Total Posts
:
1439
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 5/9/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: BPX?
-
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:47 PM
( #2 )
Never heard of this.
|
|
Marc David
-
Total Posts
:
6743
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 4/6/2003
- Location: Bay Area -CA
-
Status: offline
|
RE: BPX?
-
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:49 PM
( #3 )
Cheap pro-hormone company out of the East.. Boston? I've been looking around.. seen nothing on this.
1-AD however, gets big thumbs up from reviewers all over the place.
If you've heard it's better then 1-AD, I sure can't find it on most other bodybuilding boards, sites.. etc.
|
|
SigAlphAdam
-
Total Posts
:
15
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 9/3/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: BPX?
-
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:56 PM
( #4 )
The other day we went in to buy some 1-AD from Capital Discount Nutrition in Oak Forest, IL. Well the owner is pretty cool and he usually gives us the straight on what works and what doesn't. He said that BPX is much better than 1-AD in that it's not a precursor or something like that, i can't remember exactly what he said. According to this website http://www.thesavagefighter.com/Store/Pro_Hormone/BPX.htm BPX has 5a Androstane-3 17b-diol 50mg and 1,4-androstiene-3, 17-dione 50mg Are you guys familiar with either of these? Thanks
|
|
Twin Peak
-
Total Posts
:
1439
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 5/9/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: BPX?
-
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:00 PM
( #5 )
Yes, 1, 4 is a common PH. It is a precursor so don't let anyone fool you. Bill Llewelyn of Molecular has the patent pending, and he is (obviously) a big supporter of it.
I have not had such great results with 1, 4.
Nor have I heard of BPX, so I'd be leary.
5aa is really no big deal, and well overhyped.
|
|
SigAlphAdam
-
Total Posts
:
15
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 9/3/2003
-
Status: offline
|
RE: BPX?
-
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:12 PM
( #6 )
hmmm....so should we stick with 1-AD?
|
|
Marc David
-
Total Posts
:
6743
-
Reward points
:
10
- Joined: 4/6/2003
- Location: Bay Area -CA
-
Status: offline
|
RE: BPX?
-
Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:17 PM
( #7 )
It does seem more widely accepted, talked about, reviewed and such.. meaning it has a history, money behind it.. could be all marketing but from the reviews I've seen, people like it.
I've seen a few people ask about BPX and yet nobody knows anything about it.
Seems odd for a product that is said to be better then 1-AD.
|
|