I'm getting near my goal weight of 200 pounds. Looking at my proportions, I fear I might not look the way I want to at 200lbs.
Unlike 90% of the guys in the gym, my lower body is large and my upper is lacking (btw its not fat, I havnt been significantly over 10% bodyfat in years).
Here are the measurements that I was able to do solo (mytotape is in the mail, so more to come).
Chest: 41in (My chest is small, most of that size is from my back)
Thighs: 25.5in
Calves: 17in
Upper Arms: 14.5in
Waist: 30in
Forearms: 11.5in
Shoulders: Can't measure shoulders solo, without myotape that is. Size is actually visibly close to where id like it to be, could be a little bigger.
Unless the last 12 pounds that I put on are all in my chest and arms (and a little in my shoulders) I will reach my goal weight and not look at all how id like to. I was thinking that maybe for my last 12 pounds I should alter to my training to try and discourage further leg/ back growth, thereby preventing as much of that weight as possible from ending up on my legs.
I think I might be able to do this by doing high rep schemes for all of my leg workouts, that way I can continue to get the hormonal benefits from squats and deadlifts without the unwanted size gained in the legs and (to a lesser extent) back.
So a few questions that I need solid answers on:
Will high rep schemes limit the size increases that a muscle undergoes? Or is that a myth?
If I limit my lowerbody growth, my body should continue its slow upperbody growth correct? --> I was thinking, my legs not growing MIGHT also free up more growth material for my upperbody.
<message edited by Stillseeingreen on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:19 PM>