ORIGINAL: Beefcake
Yup its all down to a science. At first I thought it would be too much but its not. The program recomends only 1-2 sets per excercise but sometimes I do a few more.
I would never drop the pullovers since you get a stretch alot better than the pulldowns. the pulldowns are the contracted (constant tension) movement. Its been working amazing for me so I'm gonna keep at it and switch a lil bit around eventualy
i dont even know where to begin. in my original post i put in bold what you should really pay attention too.
i want to look at your split again. basically its
1back, shoulders,biceps,abs
2legs,chest,tri's
twice a week correct
unless you are doing a full body rountine you should never work large muscle groups with other large groups.
how long does workout #2 take you to finish? looks like 3 hours.
the programm recomends only 1-2 sets but you sometimes do more. 1-2 sets per exercise once a week is enough. but then you do it twice a week and on top of that and add more sets.
heres some simple science for you. there is only so much a muscle should be broken down. once it is broken down it needs some time to heel. the more its broken down the more time it needs. at 17 and looking at your build you dont have the amount of muscle that needs 122 sets per week to be broken down. also you arent giving it enough rest to rebuild.
you mention cutler and coleman. i think maybe they might, but unlikey need to lift at the level you are. and they weight 300lbs and use steriods.
why is a 17 year old beginner lifting like a 300lb pro. is any of this making sense.
all you need is about 60 sets a week. rearrange your split so you are only doing maybe 12 sets a day. stay in the gym no longer than an hour to 1.5 hours. i promise you that you will see the same results doing half the work and being smarter about it.
if more were better, the world would be full of 300lb ifbb pro monsters.